Corrigendum to "Prefrontal reactivity to TMS perturbation as a toy model of mental health outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic"[Heliyon 8 (8), (August 2022) Article e10208].

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10208.].

Prefrontal reactivity to TMS perturbation as a toy model of mental health outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Psychosocial hardships associated with the COVID-19 pandemic led many individuals to suffer adverse mental health consequences, however, others show no negative effects. We hypothesized that the electroencephalographic (EEG) response to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) could serve as a toy-model of an individual's capacity to resist psychological stress, in this case linked to the COVID-19 pandemic. We analyzed data from 74 participants who underwent mental health monitoring and concurrent electroencephalography with transcranial magnetic stimulation of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (L-DLPFC) and left inferior parietal lobule (L-IPL). Within the following 19 months, mental health was reassessed at three timepoints during lock-down confinement and different phases of de-escalation in Spain. Compared with participants who remained stable, those who experienced increased mental distress showed, months earlier, significantly larger late EEG responses locally after L-DLPFC stimulation (but not globally nor after L-IPL stimulation). This response, together with years of formal education, was significantly predictive of mental health status during the pandemic. These findings reveal that the effect of TMS perturbation offers a predictive toy model of psychosocial stress response, as exemplified by the COVID-19 pandemic.

TMS-induced EEG perturbation as a marker of psychological resilience to deleterious mental health effects during the COVID-19 pandemic

Background Social, economic and psychological hardships associated with the COVID-19 pandemic are expected to result in a global burden on mental health outcomes. However, while some individuals suffer from increasing distress and reduced quality of life, others will show no negative effects. A better understanding of brain mechanisms subtending resilience would be helpful in informing future recommendations to individuals and societies facing the present pandemic and future similar events. Here, we compared neurophysiological brain markers between individuals who exhibited resilience or vulnerability to pandemic associated psychological stress. Method 23 participants from the longitudinal study cohort of the Barcelona Brain Health Initiative (Cattaneo et al., Front. Aging Neurosci. 2018;10:321) who underwent concurrent transcranial magnetic stimulation with electroencephalography (TMS-EEG), were classified as either resilient (n=16) or non-resilient (n=7), based on their scoring in the PHQ-4 questionnaire (Kroenke et al., Psychosomatics 2009;50(6):613?21) along four timepoints;one before COVID-19 outbreak and three spanning 2.5 months during the pandemic. Individuals maintaining a score below 3 across all timepoints were deemed resilient, while those scoring below 3 before pandemic but higher than 2 at any pandemic timepoint were considered non-resilient. TMS-EEG data was collected by delivering 120 single TMS pulses to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and inferior parietal lobule (IPL). TMS evoked global mean field amplitude and local response at the stimulation site were computed. Result Figure 1 depicts time-series for DLPFC and IPL responses for both groups of subjects. Overall, non-resilient individuals exhibited a larger global response to TMS perturbation during DLPFC stimulation, as well as larger local current density estimates during IPL stimulation. Conclusion These preliminary results revealed that non-resilient individuals were more susceptible to TMS perturbation, shown by global DLPFC and local IPL reactivity. Notably, these targets are nodes of the default mode and cognitive control networks affected by stress (van Oort et al., Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2017;83:281?97), and the left frontal cortex has been proposed as a cognitive resilience hub (Franzmeier et al., J. Alzheimer?s Dis. 2017;59(4):1381?92.). Future studies should investigate and confirm the possibility that these nodes constitute a shared neurophysiological substrate for psychological and cognitive resilience.